UK cities
Direct coverage
Collision types hub
The master hub for UK collision scenarios. Roundabouts, rear-end shunts, junctions, lane changes, reversing, parked-car damage, pile-ups, head-on impacts, motorway, country road, school run, supermarket car park, winter, fog, pothole, electric vehicle, young driver, elderly driver, learner, pedestrian, cyclist, motorbike, HGV and horse-rider scenarios. Universal UK evidence flow, statute references and a route to every scenario sub-page.
UK response
Recovery dispatch and live claim handlers, 365 days a year.
UK cities
Direct coverage
Response
First contact SLA
Cost
Upfront to driver
This is the master hub for UK collision-scenario claims at CityGrip Accident Claims. It links to twenty-four scenario sub-pages - at-scene manoeuvres (roundabout, rear-end, junction, lane-change, reversing, parked-car, pile-up, head-on), environments (motorway, country road, school run, supermarket car park), weather and vehicle type (winter, fog, pothole, electric vehicle), driver cohort (young, elderly, learner, pedestrian) and third-party type (cyclist, motorbike, HGV, horse-rider). The same universal evidence flow under RTA 1988 section 170 applies to every scenario; this hub sets out the universal flow and routes you to the scenario page that matches your collision.
Scenario group 1 of 6
The four scenario patterns that dominate UK injury and damage claims by frequency. Liability typically turns on the Highway Code hierarchy (rules H1 to H3), the duty under the Road Traffic Act 1988 section 170 to stop and exchange details, and the contemporaneous evidence captured in the first ten minutes.
Mini, normal and signalised roundabouts. Lane-discipline disputes under Highway Code rules 184-190, give-way-to-the-right ambiguity and dashcam evidence on multi-lane circulatory carriageways.
Open scenario pageFollowing-too-closely collisions under Highway Code rule 126. Presumption against the rear driver, whiplash valuation under the Civil Liability Act 2018 tariff and the role of dashcam footage for chain-reaction multi-vehicle shunts.
Open scenario pageT-junctions, crossroads, staggered and signal-controlled junctions. Right-of-way disputes, sight-line obstructions, the new rule H2 priority for pedestrians crossing into a road and how junction CCTV is preserved.
Open scenario pageSide-swipe and merge collisions on dual carriageways and motorways. Mirror, signal, manoeuvre under Highway Code rule 159, blind-spot evidence and contributory negligence findings where neither driver indicated.
Open scenario pageScenario group 2 of 6
The second band of at-scene patterns covers slow-speed manoeuvring damage and the heavy-impact end of the spectrum. Reversing and parked-car collisions sit alongside multi-vehicle pile-ups and head-on impacts in this group because evidence preservation matters in both - for completely different reasons.
Driveway, car-park and street reversing collisions. Highway Code rule 200 obliges the reversing driver to give way. Parking sensors, reversing-camera footage and a clear photographic record of impact points usually decide the file.
Open scenario pageHit-while-parked and unattended-vehicle damage. RTA 1988 section 170 still applies even when no other driver is at the scene - the offending driver must leave details. Where they do not, the MIB Untraced Drivers' Agreement 2017 is the route.
Open scenario pageMotorway and dual-carriageway pile-ups, often in fog or sudden braking. Apportionment between three or more insurers, recovery sequencing, the National Highways evidence pull and the OIC portal route for portal-eligible injuries.
Open scenario pageCarriageway-crossing and overtaking collisions on undivided roads. Heavy injury weighting, accident-investigation reports under section 39 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 and the role of an independent engineer alongside a serious-injury solicitor referral.
Open scenario pageScenario group 3 of 6
Where the collision happens changes the evidence map. A motorway file pulls National Highways gantry footage; a country-road file pulls Ordnance Survey terrain data; a school-run file pulls the local authority's traffic regulation order; a supermarket car park file may pull Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 angles alongside the standard road-traffic claim.
M1, M6, M25, M62, M5 and the smart-motorway network. Live-lane safety under National Highways protocol, red-X compliance, hard-shoulder versus all-lane running and the 14-day window for gantry CCTV preservation.
Open scenario pageA-roads and rural B-roads across the Cotswolds, Lake District, Snowdonia, Norfolk, Yorkshire Dales and Highlands. Limited sight-lines, animal incursions, single-track lanes, no street lighting and the 4-mile-rule for police attendance.
Open scenario pageSchool-keep-clear markings, 20mph zones, lollipop-crossing patrols and the new Highway Code rule H2 pedestrian priority at junctions. Heightened duty of care, contributory negligence for child seatbelt compliance under Froom v Butcher.
Open scenario pageTesco, Sainsbury's, Asda, Morrisons, Aldi, Lidl, Waitrose and Marks & Spencer car parks. Off-road status, Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 angles for surface defects, ANPR retention windows and store CCTV preservation letters.
Open scenario pageScenario group 4 of 6
Weather and surface-defect scenarios change the burden of proof. Pothole files plead under Highways Act 1980 section 41 against the highway authority; fog and winter files turn on Highway Code rules 226 to 237; electric vehicle files have their own salvage, battery and repairer panel mapping.
Ice, snow, low sun and shortened daylight. Highway Code rules 228 to 231 on driving in adverse weather, the duty to keep speed low enough to stop within the visible distance and the role of Met Office severe-weather warnings on liability.
Open scenario pageHighway Code rule 226 on the use of fog lights, the 100m visibility threshold and following-distance allowances. Often combined with rear-end shunts and pile-ups - the M5 Taunton 2011 file remains the precedent for foggy-motorway pleadings.
Open scenario pageTyre, alloy, suspension and tracking damage. Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980 imposes a duty on the highway authority to maintain; the section 58 statutory defence requires evidence of an adequate inspection regime - disclosure under FOI 2000 is the route.
Open scenario pageBattery-pack damage, OEM-approved repairer panels (Tesla, Polestar, BYD, MG, BMW i, Audi e-tron), high-voltage isolation procedures and the salvage-category implications for battery-damage vehicles under the ABI Salvage Code.
Open scenario pageScenario group 5 of 6
Every UK driver moves through different licensing and insurance positions during a lifetime - provisional learner, newly qualified, experienced, mature. The cohort changes the relevant rules (rule 97, rule 233, supervisor duties, Pass Plus discount) but does not change the underlying Road Traffic Act 1988 duties that apply to every driver on a public road.
Newly-qualified drivers, telematics policies, the Road Traffic (New Drivers) Act 1995 two-year probationary period and the six-point licence revocation rule. Higher premium loadings and the impact on credit-hire eligibility.
Open scenario pageDrivers aged 70 and over, the three-yearly self-declaration to the DVLA under section 88 of the Road Traffic Act 1988, medical fitness disclosures and the interaction with insurer non-disclosure arguments under the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012.
Open scenario pageProvisional licence holders, supervising driver responsibilities under Highway Code rule 97, dual-controlled vehicles, the ADI register and motorway lessons permitted from 4 June 2018 onwards. Insurer notification mechanics for the supervising driver's policy.
Open scenario pagePedestrians under the new Highway Code rule H1-H2 hierarchy of road users. Contributory negligence under Eagle v Chambers, the 25% deduction in Froom v Butcher-style seatbelt arguments adapted for pedestrian conduct, and motor insurer responses.
Open scenario pageScenario group 6 of 6
Where the other party is a vulnerable road user or a heavy goods vehicle, the liability frame shifts. The Highway Code hierarchy at rule H1 places the greatest responsibility on the road users who can do the greatest harm - HGV drivers face the highest duty; cyclists, motorbike riders, pedestrians and horse-riders carry less in any conflict with motor traffic.
Cyclist-versus-car collisions. Highway Code rule 163 requires 1.5m passing distance at speeds up to 30mph, more at higher speed. Dooring offences under section 42 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 and regulation 105 of the Construction and Use Regulations 1986.
Open scenario pageRight-turning car versus oncoming motorbike - the SMIDSY pattern (Sorry, mate, I didn't see you). Filtering at low speed, the contributory negligence threshold and the higher-injury weighting that brings motorbike files outside the OIC portal.
Open scenario pageArticulated lorry, rigid HGV and tipper collisions. Driver-hours regulations under EU 561/2006 and the Drivers' Hours (Goods Vehicles) (Modifications) Regulations 1986, tachograph evidence and operator licensing under the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995.
Open scenario pageEquestrian-on-the-road collisions. Highway Code rule 215 obliges drivers to pass wide and slow at no more than 10mph. British Horse Society reporting, equestrian liability insurance and the rural-road overlap with the country-road scenario.
Open scenario pageEvery UK collision sits inside the same statutory frame, however the headline scenario labels read. Section 170 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 governs what every driver must do at the scene. Section 143 requires compulsory third-party insurance. The Civil Liability Act 2018, as amended by the Whiplash Injury (Amendment) Regulations 2025 (SI 2025/615), sets the small-claims-portal route for low-value injury. The Limitation Act 1980 fixes the three-year and six-year clocks that frame every file. Beneath that statutory layer the Highway Code rules engaged - including the new H1 to H3 hierarchy of road users introduced in January 2022 - shape liability findings in the county and high courts every day. This hub sets out the universal flow and routes you to twenty-four scenario sub-pages that handle the operational detail.
UK road-traffic liability is decided by reference to three layers. The first is the statutory layer - the Road Traffic Act 1988, the Civil Liability Act 2018, the Highways Act 1980 and the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 are the most commonly pleaded statutes. The second is the regulatory and Highway Code layer. Breaches of rules in the Highway Code that use the word MUST or MUST NOT are themselves offences under specific statutes; breaches of advisory rules are admissible in any civil or criminal proceedings to establish liability under section 38(7) of the Road Traffic Act 1988. The third is the common-law layer - the duty of care, the standard of the reasonable driver, contributory negligence under the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 and the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur for rear-end shunts and similar default-against-defendant patterns.
The 29 January 2022 update to the Highway Code introduced rules H1, H2 and H3 - the hierarchy of road users. Those who can do the greatest harm carry the greatest responsibility to reduce the danger they pose to others. HGV drivers carry the highest standard of care; pedestrians, cyclists and horse-riders carry the least. Rule H2 imposes a positive duty on drivers, motorcyclists and cyclists to give way to pedestrians waiting to cross a road into which the driver is turning. Rule H3 imposes a positive duty on drivers and motorcyclists to give way to cyclists going straight ahead at a junction. The courts do not treat the hierarchy as a substantive law in its own right, but the major motor insurers - Aviva, AXA, Allianz, Direct Line, Admiral, Hastings, LV=, RSA, Esure - now plead it explicitly when liability is contested between a motor vehicle and a vulnerable road user.
Contributory negligence reductions follow established lines. Froom v Butcher [1976] QB 286 fixed the 25% reduction for seatbelt non-wear where the seatbelt would have prevented the injury and 15% where it would have made the injury less severe. Capps v Miller [1989] 1 WLR 839 fixed a similar deduction range for crash-helmet non-wear. Owens v Brimmell [1977] QB 859 set the principle for a passenger who voluntarily travelled with an intoxicated driver. Eagle v Chambers [2003] EWCA Civ 1107 set the framework for pedestrian contributory negligence where the pedestrian was visible but inattentive. The percentage findings vary on the facts; the framework does not.
The first three days after any collision shape the file. Photographs of every vehicle's final resting position taken before vehicles are moved are non-replicable evidence - there is no second chance to take them. The dashcam clip backed up inside 24 hours survives the camera's looping overwrite. Witness contact details captured at the scene survive the memory fade that sets in within a week. The section 170 exchange - name, address, vehicle registration mark, insurer - is a statutory duty on every driver. Police reporting inside 24 hours, where required, is a separate statutory duty. The 14- to 28-day window for third-party CCTV preservation - National Highways gantry, supermarket store CCTV, bus-mounted CCTV, ANPR - runs from the date of the collision and cannot be extended.
Accident management work begins inside the same 72-hour window. Recovery from the scene to a secure storage site under PAS 43 protects the vehicle's evidential integrity for the engineer's report. Independent engineer instruction allows the ABI Salvage Code categorisation (Cat A, B, S or N) to be determined on neutral ground rather than at the at-fault insurer's chosen engineer's report. Like-for-like credit hire instruction under Lagden v O'Connor [2003] UKHL 64 means the driver is not left stranded while the property-damage claim moves through the at-fault insurer's process. None of those steps is exclusive - the driver can do every part of the file themselves, can use their own insurer's authorised provider, or can use a chosen accident management company. The CMCOB standalone disclosure makes that choice visible before any instruction.
For the same six-step universal flow rewritten as a plain-English walk-through for a non-fault driver, see our how to claim after a car accident guide. For the wider procedural map - England & Wales pre-action protocol, OIC portal entry points, Scottish small-claims route and the MIB timetable - see our UK accident claim process overview.
COLLISION
Section 3 of the walkthrough.
Section 170 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 applies wherever a collision causes personal injury to any person other than the driver, or damage to another vehicle or roadside property, or injury to an animal on the prescribed list. The driver must stop. The driver must, if required by any person having reasonable grounds to require it, give their name and address, the name and address of the owner if different, and the vehicle's registration mark. The driver must also produce the certificate of insurance on demand at the scene where requested by a constable or by any person with reasonable grounds. Where details are not given at the scene - for any reason - the driver must report the collision to a police constable as soon as reasonably practicable and in any event within 24 hours.
The same 24-hour rule applies where injury was caused, even if details were exchanged at the scene, unless the driver produced their insurance certificate at the scene to a constable or to any person with reasonable grounds. The 24-hour rule applies where the collision involved an animal on the prescribed list: horse, cattle, ass, mule, sheep, pig, goat or dog (the absence of cat is deliberate and long-established). Most UK police forces now accept reports through an online collision-reporting portal. The collision-reference number issued at the report will be requested by every insurer in the chain, by the Motor Insurers' Bureau where the at-fault driver turns out to be uninsured, and by the courts on any subsequent litigation.
A meaningful minority of UK collisions involve an at-fault driver who is uninsured or who cannot be traced. Where the driver is identified but uninsured - usually because the policy is invalid or the driver is using the vehicle outside the policy terms in breach of section 143 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 - the claim runs against the Motor Insurers' Bureau under the MIB Uninsured Drivers' Agreement 2015. Where the driver cannot be identified at all, typically a hit-and-run case, the claim runs against the MIB under the Untraced Drivers' Agreement 2017.
Both Agreements impose strict procedural rules. The Untraced Agreement requires a police report and, for property-damage claims, proper application to the MIB inside 14 days of the collision. The Uninsured Agreement contains its own exclusion clauses; the most significant is the exclusion for passengers who knew or ought to have known that the vehicle was being used without insurance, illustrated in Stinton v Stinton [1995] RTR 167. Excess deductions apply to property-damage claims under both Agreements; the £300 excess on damage-only claims has been a long-running feature of the MIB framework. The MIB's recovery action against the uninsured driver remains a feature of every Uninsured Agreement file, separate from the underlying claimant compensation.
Soft-tissue neck, back and shoulder injuries - collectively whiplash - sit inside a fixed-tariff regime introduced by the Civil Liability Act 2018. Where the general damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity are valued under £5,000 the claim runs through the Official Injury Claim portal at officialinjuryclaim.org.uk on the small-claims track. The tariff was reviewed and uplifted by the Whiplash Injury (Amendment) Regulations 2025 (Statutory Instrument SI 2025/615), which apply to accidents occurring on or after 31 May 2025. The current bands run from a few hundred pounds for short-duration soft-tissue injury through to around four thousand pounds for fifteen-to-twenty-four-month bands. A modest uplift is available where the injury significantly affects the claimant's ability to function during the symptomatic period.
The OIC portal is designed for use without a legal representative - the claimant completes the form, the claim is sent to the at-fault driver's insurer, a medical report is obtained from a MedCo-accredited reporter and the tariff calculation follows. Where the injury is more serious, where there is a vulnerability, where liability is contested or where general damages exceed the small-claims limit, the claim sits outside the portal and proceeds through an SRA-regulated solicitor on the standard litigation route. CityGrip refers personal-injury work to a panel solicitor with the referral arrangement disclosed under CMCOB 6 and CMCOB 7 at the point of instruction.
Credit hire is a like-for-like replacement vehicle provided to a non-fault driver on credit terms while the damaged vehicle is repaired or written off. The hire charges are recovered from the at-fault driver's insurer subject to reasonable need and impecuniosity. The leading authority is Lagden v O'Connor [2003] UKHL 64; the like-for-like principle is confirmed in Bee v Jenson [2007] EWCA Civ 923; the rate-basket and reasonableness tests run through Dimond v Lovell [2002] 1 AC 384 and Coles v Hetherton [2013] EWCA Civ 1704. A like-for-like replacement matches the off-road vehicle by class, body type, drivetrain, equipment level and - where relevant - emission-zone compliance for ULEZ, the Birmingham CAZ Class D or the other UK clean-air zones.
A courtesy car offered by the driver's own insurer is a different product. It is typically a small hatchback supplied without like-for-like matching, often for a limited number of days only and frequently subject to a £750 excess for at-fault use. Where the off-road vehicle is a hire-and-reward minicab, a courier van, an electric vehicle, a wheelchair-accessible vehicle or a clean-air-zone-compliant vehicle, the courtesy car is almost never lawful or fit for purpose. The choice between credit hire and courtesy car turns on need, on the duration of off-road time and on the at-fault driver's insurance status - credit hire is only available where the at-fault driver is identified and insured. Where the driver is uninsured or untraced, the MIB route applies and credit hire is not recoverable.
Two scenarios that look identical on the headline rarely share the same evidence map. A rear-end shunt on a foggy stretch of the M5 near Taunton pulls National Highways gantry CCTV inside the 14-day window and a Met Office severe-weather warning record. A rear-end shunt at a 20mph signal-controlled junction in Bristol pulls bus-mounted CCTV from First Bus West of England and the council's traffic-signal-phase data through an FOI request. A reversing collision in a supermarket car park pulls the chain's store CCTV - Tesco, Sainsbury's, Asda, Morrisons, Aldi, Lidl, Waitrose and Marks & Spencer all run different retention windows - and may engage the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 alongside the road-traffic claim.
Scenario templates fail because they smooth over the operational detail that decides files. The 14-day evidence window for gantry CCTV is a hard cut-off. The section 41 Highways Act 1980 pothole claim turns on disclosure of the highway authority's inspection regime under section 58 - a different document set for each of the 152 English county and unitary authorities and the further authorities in Scotland and Wales. The CAZ-compliance test for a like-for-like replacement varies between Birmingham, Bristol, Bath, Portsmouth, Sheffield, Tyneside, Bradford and London. CityGrip records the scenario particulars at intake and routes the evidence chain to the scenario-specific sub-page rather than forcing every file onto a generic template.
Accident management and legal representation are different functions under different regulators. A regulated claims-management company (CMC) holds FCA authorisation under the Claims Management Conduct of Business sourcebook (CMCOB). A solicitor's firm holds Solicitors Regulation Authority authorisation. CityGrip Accident Claims is neither: it is a UK accident claim management business that sits outside the FCA claims-management perimeter. Property-damage, recovery, storage, credit hire, engineer instruction and repair coordination sit inside our non-regulated remit. Personal-injury work - pleadings, witness statements, medical reports, court proceedings, settlement negotiation, fatal-accident claims under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 and the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934 - is for the solicitor.
Specific scenarios more often warrant an immediate solicitor introduction. Head-on collisions on undivided rural A-roads, motorway pile-ups with multiple injuries, cyclist-versus-HGV fatalities and motorbike SMIDSY collisions outside the £5,000 small-claims threshold sit on the solicitor side of the boundary. CityGrip introduces personal-injury work to an SRA-regulated panel solicitor - only with the customer's explicit written consent - with the introduction arrangement disclosed in writing at the point of consent. We do not pay or accept prohibited PI referral fees under section 56 LASPO 2012. The customer-choice principle modelled on CMCOB 4.3.1R(1A) - confirming the customer is not obliged to use a claims management company - is published on every claim-intent page on the site as a voluntary quality standard, including this hub.
This collision-types hub sits below the top-level UK accident hub and alongside the minicab and courier verticals. Each linked hub deepens one part of the picture: the non-fault claim workflow, the private-hire trade frame and the delivery-rider frame.
Top-level UK car accident claim hub covering the entire non-fault driver workflow.
End-to-end non-fault claim coordination - recovery, storage, engineer, credit hire and repair.
UK private hire vehicle accident hub - Uber, Bolt, Addison Lee, FreeNow and local firms.
Cross-vertical hub for delivery riders and drivers - Deliveroo, Uber Eats, Just Eat, Amazon Flex.
Ranking factors
The six factors that distinguish a strong UK collision claim from a weak one. The same six apply across every scenario on this hub - roundabout to horse-rider, pothole to pile-up. CityGrip handles each on a claim-by-claim basis, not by scenario template.
The single strongest predictor of claim outcome is what happens in the first three days. Dashcam clips backed up, scene photographs taken before vehicles moved, witness contact details captured, the section 170 exchange completed and the police-reporting deadline met. Files opened inside 72 hours settle faster and at higher percentages than files opened weeks later.
Window: 0-72 hours
Every claim sits inside a defined UK process - RTA 1988, the OIC portal under the Civil Liability Act 2018, the MIB Uninsured 2015 or Untraced 2017 Agreements, the Limitation Act 1980 clock and the Highway Code rules engaged. A file with the right statute references on day one moves through the process cleanly; a file built on generic narrative does not.
Authority: legislation.gov.uk + gov.uk
Third-party CCTV, ANPR and traffic-camera footage typically retains for 14 to 28 days only. National Highways gantry CCTV holds for around 14 days. Supermarket store CCTV varies by chain - Tesco and Sainsbury's typically 30 days, Aldi and Lidl shorter. Bus-mounted CCTV is operator-specific. Preservation letters must be sent inside the retention window or the evidence is gone forever.
Window: 14-28 days
CityGrip Accident Claims is a UK accident claim management business - we sit outside the FCA claims-management perimeter and outside the SRA solicitor perimeter. We handle the property-damage chain - recovery, storage, credit hire, engineer, repair and third-party insurer dialogue - on commercial contracts. Personal-injury work is introduced to an SRA-regulated solicitor with the customer's explicit written consent, the introduction arrangement disclosed in writing and no prohibited LASPO referral fees. The CMCOB 4.3.1R(1A) customer-choice principle is published voluntarily on every claim-intent page as a quality standard.
Reference: LASPO s.56; SRA Code; CMCOB 4 used voluntarily
Scenario template handling fails because the evidence map shifts case-by-case. A pothole damage claim pleads section 41 Highways Act 1980 and tests the section 58 statutory defence through FOI disclosure of the inspection regime. A rear-end shunt on a smart motorway pulls red-X compliance and gantry data. CityGrip records the scenario particulars at intake so the right evidence chain runs from day one.
Method: claim-by-claim, not template
CityGrip Accident Claims (Citygrip LTD) is the accident management entity. Independent engineers, recovery operators, BS 10125-certified repairers and SRA-regulated panel solicitors are named on the file at the point of referral. Every onward referral is disclosed in writing with the referral fee position made explicit. Reviewed entities are real, named UK businesses - not placeholders.
Disclosure: SRA + FCA + ABI panels
The same six steps apply to every scenario in this hub. Step one secures the scene; step six routes the file to the right onward chain. Speak to a CityGrip handler at any point in the flow.
Step 1
Make the scene safe and check for injury
Stop, switch on hazard warning lights, check yourself and your passengers for injury and check every other occupant of every other vehicle. Do not exit the vehicle on a live motorway lane or smart-motorway running lane - National Highways protocol requires occupants to stay in the vehicle with seatbelts on where it is too dangerous to leave. Where the carriageway can be cleared safely, move vehicles to the verge or the nearest safe lay-by. Where injury is present or the road is blocked, call 999.
Step 2
Capture contemporaneous evidence before vehicles are moved
Photograph each vehicle's final resting position from at least three angles before anything is moved. Photograph the registration plates, the damage panels, the road markings, traffic signs, traffic-signal phase if relevant and any debris field. Back up the dashcam clip within 24 hours to cloud storage and to a second device - local SD cards overwrite, and many dashcams loop within 24 hours. Note the time of impact to the minute; speed-of-recollection deteriorates within a week.
Step 3
Exchange details under Road Traffic Act 1988 section 170
Every driver involved must give their name, address, vehicle registration mark and (where requested) the name and address of the insurer to every other driver and to any person reasonably requiring them. If the vehicle is not owned by the driver, the owner's name and address are also required. The exchange duty applies whether or not the driver believes they were at fault. Anyone refusing to exchange details, or anyone who has caused injury, must be reported to the police.
Step 4
Report to police where required and obtain a reference number
Where injury was caused, where details were not exchanged at the scene, or where an animal listed in RTA 1988 s.170(8) was hurt, report to a police constable as soon as reasonably practicable and within 24 hours at the latest. Most UK forces accept online collision reports through their published portal. Obtain the crime, incident or collision reference number - it will be requested by every insurer and by the MIB if the at-fault driver turns out to be uninsured or untraced.
Step 5
Notify your own insurer for information purposes
Even where you are non-fault, your policy schedule will require notification of any collision involving your vehicle. Notification does not commit you to claiming against your own policy - it preserves your no-claims discount, prevents an avoidance argument under the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012, and gives the insurer the chance to log the file. Where the at-fault driver is identified and insured, you can elect to claim through their insurer instead and avoid touching your own no-claims discount.
Step 6
Contact accident management and start the claim file
Open the file with an accident management company at the earliest opportunity - recovery, secure storage, an independent engineer's report under the ABI Salvage Code, like-for-like credit hire under Lagden v O'Connor, repair coordination at a BS 10125-certified bodyshop and direct dialogue with the at-fault driver's insurer all start from this single call. Personal-injury work is referred onward to an SRA-regulated solicitor with the referral arrangement disclosed in writing under CMCOB 6 and CMCOB 7.
Twenty-four scenario sub-pages, one universal evidence flow. Recovery, secure storage, independent engineer, like-for-like credit hire and onward solicitor referral where the injury or liability warrants it. CityGrip Accident Claims (Citygrip LTD).
Calls may be recorded for quality and compliance. We do not provide legal advice. Personal injury enquiries are referred only with your consent to authorised partners.
Visit our team
London office
124 City Road
London, EC1V 2NX